Comparison

Finely Sliced Witshire Cured Ham vs 8 Slices Peel Here TESCO WAFER THIN HONEY ROAST HA

Overall, Finely Sliced Witshire Cured Ham has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFinely Sliced Witshire Cured...8 Slices Peel Here TESCO WAF...
Nutri-Score d —
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 126 kcal 119 kcal
Fat 2.9 g 2.5 g
Saturated fat 1 g 0.9 g
Sugars 0.1 g 2.2 g
Salt 2.2 g —
Fiber 0.5 g 1 g
Protein 24.7 g 21.3 g
Additives27
AllergensPorkPork

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • 8 Slices Peel Here TESCO WAFER THIN HONEY ROAST HA has 14% less fat (2.5 g vs 2.9 g).
  • Finely Sliced Witshire Cured Ham has 95% less sugar (0.1 g vs 2.2 g).
  • 8 Slices Peel Here TESCO WAFER THIN HONEY ROAST HA has 50% more fiber (1 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Finely Sliced Witshire Cured Ham has 14% more protein (24.7 g vs 21.3 g).
  • Finely Sliced Witshire Cured Ham is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Finely Sliced Witshire Cured Ham

Pork, Salt, Preservatives (Sodium Nitrite, Potassium Nitrate).

8 Slices Peel Here TESCO WAFER THIN HONEY ROAST HA

Pork (98%), Honey, Mineral Sea Salt, Brown Sugar, Stabilisers (Potassium Triphosphate, Pentasodium Triphosphate, Tetrapotassium Diphosphate), Caramelised Sugar Syrup, Antioxidant (Sodium Ascorbate), Preservative (Sodium Nitrite)

FAQ

Which is healthier: Finely Sliced Witshire Cured Ham or 8 Slices Peel Here TESCO WAFER THIN HONEY ROAST HA?

Overall, Finely Sliced Witshire Cured Ham has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

8 Slices Peel Here TESCO WAFER THIN HONEY ROAST HA has fewer calories: 119 kcal versus 126 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Finely Sliced Witshire Cured Ham has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 2.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons