Comparison

Filets de maquereaux sauce tomate vs Filets de maquereau grillés (à l'huile d'olive vierge extra)

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFilets de maquereaux sauce t...Filets de maquereau grillés...
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group — 3
Calories 187 kcal 308 kcal
Fat 13 g 24 g
Saturated fat 13 g 4.7 g
Sugars 2.2 g 0 g
Salt 0.7 g 1 g
Fiber — 0 g
Protein 15 g 23 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedFish

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Filets de maquereaux sauce tomate has 39% fewer calories (187 kcal vs 308 kcal).
  • Filets de maquereaux sauce tomate has 46% less fat (13 g vs 24 g).
  • Filets de maquereau grillés (à l'huile d'olive vierge extra) has 64% less saturated fat (4.7 g vs 13 g).
  • Filets de maquereau grillés (à l'huile d'olive vierge extra) has no sugar, while Filets de maquereaux sauce tomate has 2.2 g.
  • Filets de maquereaux sauce tomate has 30% less salt (0.7 g vs 1 g).
  • Filets de maquereau grillés (à l'huile d'olive vierge extra) has 35% more protein (23 g vs 15 g).
  • Only Filets de maquereau grillés (à l'huile d'olive vierge extra) lists: Fish.

Ingredients

Filets de maquereaux sauce tomate

Not available.

Filets de maquereau grillés (à l'huile d'olive vierge extra)

maquereau 65%,huile de navette,16,7% huile d'olive vierges extra,sel

FAQ

Which is healthier: Filets de maquereaux sauce tomate or Filets de maquereau grillés (à l'huile d'olive vierge extra)?

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Filets de maquereaux sauce tomate has fewer calories: 187 kcal versus 308 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Filets de maquereau grillés (à l'huile d'olive vierge extra) has less sugar: 0 g versus 2.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons