Comparison

Filets de maquereaux sauce escabèche vs Filets de maquereaux sauce escabèche

Overall, Filets de maquereaux sauce escabèche has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFilets de maquereaux sauce e...Filets de maquereaux sauce e...
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group — 4
Calories 224 kcal 199 kcal
Fat 19 g 14.9 g
Saturated fat 3.5 g 2.5 g
Sugars 1.2 g 1.7 g
Salt 0.9 g 1 g
Fiber — 0.2 g
Protein 11 g 13.1 g
Additives02
AllergensNone listedFish

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Filets de maquereaux sauce escabèche has 11% fewer calories (199 kcal vs 224 kcal).
  • Filets de maquereaux sauce escabèche has 22% less fat (14.9 g vs 19 g).
  • Filets de maquereaux sauce escabèche has 29% less saturated fat (2.5 g vs 3.5 g).
  • Filets de maquereaux sauce escabèche has 29% less sugar (1.2 g vs 1.7 g).
  • Filets de maquereaux sauce escabèche has 16% more protein (13.1 g vs 11 g).
  • Only Filets de maquereaux sauce escabèche lists: Fish.

Ingredients

Filets de maquereaux sauce escabèche

Not available.

Filets de maquereaux sauce escabèche

Filets de maquereaux (poisson) 56%, eau, vinaigre d'alcool 6,9%, huile de colza, oignons 2,3%, purée de tomates double concentrée 1,8%, sel, amidon transformé de maïs, sucre, épaississant : gomme xanthane, persil, arôme, piment.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Filets de maquereaux sauce escabèche or Filets de maquereaux sauce escabèche?

Overall, Filets de maquereaux sauce escabèche has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Filets de maquereaux sauce escabèche has fewer calories: 199 kcal versus 224 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Filets de maquereaux sauce escabèche has less sugar: 1.2 g versus 1.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons