Filets de maquereaux fumés au poivre vs Maquereau Fumé Au Poivre X2
Overall, Maquereau Fumé Au Poivre X2 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Filets de maquereaux fumés au poivre
Maquereau Fumé Au Poivre X2
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Filets de maquereaux fumés a... | Maquereau Fumé Au Poivre X2 |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 265 kcal | 202 kcal |
| Fat | 21 g | 14 g |
| Saturated fat | 6.5 g | 3 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 2 g | 3.2 g |
| Fiber | 0.3 g | — |
| Protein | 18 g | 18 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Maquereau Fumé Au Poivre X2 has 24% fewer calories (202 kcal vs 265 kcal).
- Maquereau Fumé Au Poivre X2 has 33% less fat (14 g vs 21 g).
- Maquereau Fumé Au Poivre X2 has 54% less saturated fat (3 g vs 6.5 g).
- Maquereau Fumé Au Poivre X2 has no sugar, while Filets de maquereaux fumés au poivre has 0.5 g.
- Filets de maquereaux fumés au poivre has 38% less salt (2 g vs 3.2 g).
- Filets de maquereaux fumés au poivre has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Filets de maquereaux fumés au poivre
_Maquereau_ (Scomber scombrus) 97%, sel, poivre 1%.
Maquereau Fumé Au Poivre X2
Maquereau (Somber scombrus) (POISSON) pêché au chalut en Océan Atlantique Nord-Est, en Mer du Nord, poivre, sel, fumé au bois de hêtre
FAQ
Which is healthier: Filets de maquereaux fumés au poivre or Maquereau Fumé Au Poivre X2?
Overall, Maquereau Fumé Au Poivre X2 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Maquereau Fumé Au Poivre X2 has fewer calories: 202 kcal versus 265 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Maquereau Fumé Au Poivre X2 has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.