Filets de Cabillaud MSC vs 6 Filets de Cabillaud
Overall, 6 Filets de Cabillaud has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Filets de Cabillaud MSC | 6 Filets de Cabillaud |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 74 kcal | 73 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 17 g | 17 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- 6 Filets de Cabillaud has 80% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
Ingredients
Filets de Cabillaud MSC
4 portions de filets de Cabillaud (Gadus morhua) , pêché au chalut en océan Atlantique Nord-Est (mer de Barents et mers de Norvège), surgelées.
6 Filets de Cabillaud
Cabillaud
FAQ
Which is healthier: Filets de Cabillaud MSC or 6 Filets de Cabillaud?
Overall, 6 Filets de Cabillaud has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
6 Filets de Cabillaud has fewer calories: 73 kcal versus 74 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Filets de Cabillaud MSC has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.