Filet de panga vs Qualité & Prix Pangasiusfilets
Overall, Qualité & Prix Pangasiusfilets has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Filet de panga | Qualité & Prix Pangasiusfile... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | 1 |
| Calories | 50 kcal | 74 kcal |
| Fat | 0.8 g | 0.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.4 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 10 g | 17 g |
| Additives | 5 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Filet de panga has 32% fewer calories (50 kcal vs 74 kcal).
- Qualité & Prix Pangasiusfilets has 86% less salt (0.1 g vs 0.4 g).
- Qualité & Prix Pangasiusfilets has 41% more protein (17 g vs 10 g).
- Qualité & Prix Pangasiusfilets is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Filet de panga
FILETS DE PANGA avec eau ajoutée CONGELES SANS PEAU SANS ARETES INGREDIENTS PANGA, EAU 10%, SEL , STABILISANT (E451. E452), ANTI-OXYDANT (E330, E331, E332) ALLERGENES: POISSON
Qualité & Prix Pangasiusfilets
filets de pangas (poisson élévé au Vietnam).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Filet de panga or Qualité & Prix Pangasiusfilets?
Overall, Qualité & Prix Pangasiusfilets has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Filet de panga has fewer calories: 50 kcal versus 74 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Filet de panga has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.