Comparison

Filet de dos de saumon vs Dos de saumon

Overall, Dos de saumon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFilet de dos de saumonDos de saumon
Nutri-Score e a
NOVA group — —
Calories 195 kcal 208 kcal
Fat 11 g 13.6 g
Saturated fat 3 g 2.6 g
Sugars 0.5 g 0 g
Salt 3.3 g 0.1 g
Protein 23 g 20.9 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedFish

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Filet de dos de saumon has 19% less fat (11 g vs 13.6 g).
  • Dos de saumon has 13% less saturated fat (2.6 g vs 3 g).
  • Dos de saumon has no sugar, while Filet de dos de saumon has 0.5 g.
  • Dos de saumon has 97% less salt (0.1 g vs 3.3 g).
  • Dos de saumon has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Dos de saumon lists: Fish.

Ingredients

Filet de dos de saumon

Not available.

Dos de saumon

Suprême atlanli( - w. Nerpa(ktt Salmo salar. Saumon (90isson) irais loins aus gras satGés/davon gesàttigte Luckerarten: O g. Protéines/ g. produit n'a pas en sel est une estimation de la en sodium du produit / Das Produkt gesa\zen. sa\zgehalt ist aUsschlieBlich VOrkommenden Hergestellt in NOrwegen H 82 SEA* WWWSAUMAÇR BREMNES SEASHORE AS 5430 BREMNES, NORWAY

FAQ

Which is healthier: Filet de dos de saumon or Dos de saumon?

Overall, Dos de saumon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Filet de dos de saumon has fewer calories: 195 kcal versus 208 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Dos de saumon has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons