Comparison
Filet de carrelet MSC vs MSC Filet de carrelet
Overall, Filet de carrelet MSC has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Filet de carrelet MSC | MSC Filet de carrelet |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 63 kcal | 82 kcal |
| Fat | 0.6 g | 2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 1 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 1 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 14.4 g | 16 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Filet de carrelet MSC has 23% fewer calories (63 kcal vs 82 kcal).
- Filet de carrelet MSC has 70% less fat (0.6 g vs 2 g).
- Filet de carrelet MSC has no saturated fat, while MSC Filet de carrelet has 1 g.
- Filet de carrelet MSC has no sugar, while MSC Filet de carrelet has 1 g.
Ingredients
Filet de carrelet MSC
Not available.
MSC Filet de carrelet
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Filet de carrelet MSC or MSC Filet de carrelet?
Overall, Filet de carrelet MSC has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Filet de carrelet MSC has fewer calories: 63 kcal versus 82 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Filet de carrelet MSC has less sugar: 0 g versus 1 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Filet de carrelet MSC vs Filets de carrelets
MSC Filet de carrelet vs Filets de carrelets
Filet de carrelet MSC vs Filets De Carrelet
MSC Filet de carrelet vs Filets De Carrelet
Filet de carrelet MSC vs Filets de carrelets
MSC Filet de carrelet vs Filets de carrelets
Filet de carrelet MSC vs MSC Filet de carrelet
MSC Filet de carrelet vs MSC Filet de carrelet