Comparison

Farine de Coco de Sao Tomé vs REWE Bio Kokosmehl

Overall, REWE Bio Kokosmehl has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFarine de Coco de Sao ToméREWE Bio Kokosmehl
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group — —
Calories 356 kcal 338 kcal
Fat 11.8 g 10 g
Saturated fat 10.6 g 9 g
Sugars 19.3 g 21 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.1 g
Fiber 28 g 38 g
Protein 23.6 g 21 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • REWE Bio Kokosmehl has 15% less fat (10 g vs 11.8 g).
  • REWE Bio Kokosmehl has 15% less saturated fat (9 g vs 10.6 g).
  • REWE Bio Kokosmehl has 26% more fiber (38 g vs 28 g).
  • Farine de Coco de Sao Tomé has 11% more protein (23.6 g vs 21 g).

Ingredients

Farine de Coco de Sao Tomé

Farine de coco (¹)(2) 100% (Cocos nucifera) (1) Produit issu de l'agriculture biologique (2) Commerce Equitable contrôlé selon le référentiel Fair for Life 100% du total des ingrédients d'origine agricole sont issus de filière BIOPARTENAIREⓇ ■Plus d'informations sur www.BIOPARTENAIRE.COM Information filière équitable: www.ecoidées.com (Lien filières équitables - Farine de coco) 3 760087 362510 Poids net 400g Origine: São Tomé 2, rue Félix Dournay-67250 Soultz-sous-Forêts Conditionné en France pour Ecoidées SAS tél. 03 88 80 59 75 fax 03 88 80 97 60 www.ecoidees.com N° de lot /

REWE Bio Kokosmehl

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Farine de Coco de Sao Tomé or REWE Bio Kokosmehl?

Overall, REWE Bio Kokosmehl has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

REWE Bio Kokosmehl has fewer calories: 338 kcal versus 356 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Farine de Coco de Sao Tomé has less sugar: 19.3 g versus 21 g per 100 g.

More comparisons