Escargots de Bourgogne sauvages au court-bouillon vs Escargots de Bourgogne
Overall, Escargots de Bourgogne sauvages au court-bouillon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Escargots de Bourgogne sauvages au court-bouillon
Escargots de Bourgogne
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Escargots de Bourgogne sauva... | Escargots de Bourgogne |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 80 kcal | 89 kcal |
| Fat | 1.1 g | 1.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.7 g | 1.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 16 g | 16.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Molluscs | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Escargots de Bourgogne sauvages au court-bouillon has 10% fewer calories (80 kcal vs 89 kcal).
- Escargots de Bourgogne sauvages au court-bouillon has 27% less fat (1.1 g vs 1.5 g).
- Escargots de Bourgogne has 98% less sugar (0 g vs 0.5 g).
- Escargots de Bourgogne sauvages au court-bouillon has 37% less salt (0.7 g vs 1.1 g).
- Only Escargots de Bourgogne sauvages au court-bouillon lists: Molluscs.
Ingredients
Escargots de Bourgogne sauvages au court-bouillon
Chairs d'escargots cuites Helix Pomatia (Linné) [Mollusque - Origine UE et non-UE (Serbie)], eau, sel, plantes aromatiques, épices.
Escargots de Bourgogne
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Escargots de Bourgogne sauvages au court-bouillon or Escargots de Bourgogne?
Overall, Escargots de Bourgogne sauvages au court-bouillon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Escargots de Bourgogne sauvages au court-bouillon has fewer calories: 80 kcal versus 89 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Escargots de Bourgogne has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.