Escargots de Bourgogne vs 36 escargots de Bourgogne
Overall, Escargots de Bourgogne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Escargots de Bourgogne | 36 escargots de Bourgogne |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 89 kcal | 340 kcal |
| Fat | 1.5 g | 33 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 22 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.1 g | 1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.6 g |
| Protein | 16.8 g | 8.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Escargots de Bourgogne has 74% fewer calories (89 kcal vs 340 kcal).
- Escargots de Bourgogne has 95% less fat (1.5 g vs 33 g).
- Escargots de Bourgogne has 98% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 22 g).
- 36 escargots de Bourgogne has 100% more fiber (0.6 g vs 0 g).
- Escargots de Bourgogne has 49% more protein (16.8 g vs 8.6 g).
- Escargots de Bourgogne has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Escargots de Bourgogne
Not available.
36 escargots de Bourgogne
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Escargots de Bourgogne or 36 escargots de Bourgogne?
Overall, Escargots de Bourgogne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Escargots de Bourgogne has fewer calories: 89 kcal versus 340 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
36 escargots de Bourgogne has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.