Comparison

Escargots de Bourgogne vs 36 escargots de Bourgogne

Overall, Escargots de Bourgogne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientEscargots de Bourgogne36 escargots de Bourgogne
Nutri-Score a d
NOVA group — —
Calories 89 kcal 340 kcal
Fat 1.5 g 33 g
Saturated fat 0.4 g 22 g
Sugars 0 g 0 g
Salt 1.1 g 1 g
Fiber 0 g 0.6 g
Protein 16.8 g 8.6 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Escargots de Bourgogne has 74% fewer calories (89 kcal vs 340 kcal).
  • Escargots de Bourgogne has 95% less fat (1.5 g vs 33 g).
  • Escargots de Bourgogne has 98% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 22 g).
  • 36 escargots de Bourgogne has 100% more fiber (0.6 g vs 0 g).
  • Escargots de Bourgogne has 49% more protein (16.8 g vs 8.6 g).
  • Escargots de Bourgogne has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Escargots de Bourgogne

Not available.

36 escargots de Bourgogne

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Escargots de Bourgogne or 36 escargots de Bourgogne?

Overall, Escargots de Bourgogne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Escargots de Bourgogne has fewer calories: 89 kcal versus 340 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

36 escargots de Bourgogne has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.

More comparisons