Comparison

36 escargots de Bourgogne vs Escargots de Bourgogne

Overall, Escargots de Bourgogne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient36 escargots de BourgogneEscargots de Bourgogne
Nutri-Score d a
NOVA group — 4
Calories 340 kcal 87 kcal
Fat 33 g 1 g
Saturated fat 22 g 0.3 g
Sugars 0 g 0.5 g
Salt 1 g 0.8 g
Fiber 0.6 g —
Protein 8.6 g 18 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedMolluscs

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Escargots de Bourgogne has 74% fewer calories (87 kcal vs 340 kcal).
  • Escargots de Bourgogne has 97% less fat (1 g vs 33 g).
  • Escargots de Bourgogne has 99% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 22 g).
  • 36 escargots de Bourgogne has no sugar, while Escargots de Bourgogne has 0.5 g.
  • Escargots de Bourgogne has 52% more protein (18 g vs 8.6 g).
  • Escargots de Bourgogne has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Escargots de Bourgogne lists: Molluscs.

Ingredients

36 escargots de Bourgogne

Not available.

Escargots de Bourgogne

Chairs d'escargots de Bourgogne (Helix pomatia) (contient _mollusques_), eau, sel, arôme naturel. Minimum de 45 chairs d'escargots.

FAQ

Which is healthier: 36 escargots de Bourgogne or Escargots de Bourgogne?

Overall, Escargots de Bourgogne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Escargots de Bourgogne has fewer calories: 87 kcal versus 340 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

36 escargots de Bourgogne has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons