Comparison

Epinards en branches en portions issus de l'agriculture biologiqueproduit surgelé vs Haricots plats déjà cuits

Overall, Epinards en branches en portions issus de l'agriculture biologiqueproduit surgelé has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientEpinards en branches en port...Haricots plats déjà cuits
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group 1 1
Calories 24 kcal 33 kcal
Fat 0.5 g 0.5 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 0.1 g
Sugars 0.9 g 2.1 g
Salt 0.1 g 0 g
Fiber 3 g 2.8 g
Protein 2.8 g 1.8 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Epinards en branches en portions issus de l'agriculture biologiqueproduit surgelé has 27% fewer calories (24 kcal vs 33 kcal).
  • Epinards en branches en portions issus de l'agriculture biologiqueproduit surgelé has 57% less sugar (0.9 g vs 2.1 g).
  • Epinards en branches en portions issus de l'agriculture biologiqueproduit surgelé has 36% more protein (2.8 g vs 1.8 g).

Ingredients

Epinards en branches en portions issus de l'agriculture biologiqueproduit surgelé

Epinards biologiques

Haricots plats déjà cuits

Haricots plats coupés cuits

FAQ

Which is healthier: Epinards en branches en portions issus de l'agriculture biologiqueproduit surgelé or Haricots plats déjà cuits?

Overall, Epinards en branches en portions issus de l'agriculture biologiqueproduit surgelé has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Epinards en branches en portions issus de l'agriculture biologiqueproduit surgelé has fewer calories: 24 kcal versus 33 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Epinards en branches en portions issus de l'agriculture biologiqueproduit surgelé has less sugar: 0.9 g versus 2.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons