Comparison

Engvang Sød Mælk 3.5 % vs 2.5% pasterizēts piens

Overall, 2.5% pasterizēts piens has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient	Engvang Sød Mælk 3.5 %	2.5% pasterizēts piens
Nutri-Score	c	b
NOVA group	—	—
Calories	63 kcal	53 kcal
Fat	3.5 g	2.5 g
Saturated fat	2.2 g	2 g
Sugars	4.6 g	4.7 g
Salt	0.1 g	0.1 g
Protein	3.4 g	3 g
Additives	0	0
Allergens	Milk	Milk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

2.5% pasterizēts piens has 16% fewer calories (53 kcal vs 63 kcal).
2.5% pasterizēts piens has 29% less fat (2.5 g vs 3.5 g).
Engvang Sød Mælk 3.5 % has 12% more protein (3.4 g vs 3 g).
2.5% pasterizēts piens has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Engvang Sød Mælk 3.5 %

Mælk 3,5% fedt. Homogeniseret og pasteuriseret.

2.5% pasterizēts piens

Pasterizēts _piens_

FAQ

Which is healthier: Engvang Sød Mælk 3.5 % or 2.5% pasterizēts piens?

Overall, 2.5% pasterizēts piens has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

2.5% pasterizēts piens has fewer calories: 53 kcal versus 63 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Engvang Sød Mælk 3.5 % has less sugar: 4.6 g versus 4.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Engvang Sød Mælk 3.5 % vs Andechser Bio Milch 1,5%... Andechser Bio Milch 1,5%... vs 2.5% pasterizēts piens Engvang Sød Mælk 3.5 % vs G+G Laktosefreie H-Fetta... G+G Laktosefreie H-Fetta... vs 2.5% pasterizēts piens Engvang Sød Mælk 3.5 % vs Milch Milch vs 2.5% pasterizēts piens Engvang Sød Mælk 3.5 % vs Weide-Milch 1,5% Fett Weide-Milch 1,5% Fett vs 2.5% pasterizēts piens