Comparison
Milch vs 2.5% pasterizēts piens
Overall, Milch has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Milch | 2.5% pasterizēts piens |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 47 kcal | 53 kcal |
| Fat | 1.5 g | 2.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 1 g | 2 g |
| Sugars | 4.9 g | 4.7 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 3.4 g | 3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Milch has 11% fewer calories (47 kcal vs 53 kcal).
- Milch has 40% less fat (1.5 g vs 2.5 g).
- Milch has 50% less saturated fat (1 g vs 2 g).
- Milch has 12% more protein (3.4 g vs 3 g).
- Only 2.5% pasterizēts piens lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Milch
Not available.
2.5% pasterizēts piens
Pasterizēts _piens_
FAQ
Which is healthier: Milch or 2.5% pasterizēts piens?
Overall, Milch has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Milch has fewer calories: 47 kcal versus 53 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
2.5% pasterizēts piens has less sugar: 4.7 g versus 4.9 g per 100 g.