Comparison
Engvang Sød Mælk 3.5 % vs Milch
Overall, Milch has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Engvang Sød Mælk 3.5 % | Milch |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | b |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 63 kcal | 47 kcal |
| Fat | 3.5 g | 1.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.2 g | 1 g |
| Sugars | 4.6 g | 4.9 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 3.4 g | 3.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Milch has 25% fewer calories (47 kcal vs 63 kcal).
- Milch has 57% less fat (1.5 g vs 3.5 g).
- Milch has 55% less saturated fat (1 g vs 2.2 g).
- Milch has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Engvang Sød Mælk 3.5 % lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Engvang Sød Mælk 3.5 %
Mælk 3,5% fedt. Homogeniseret og pasteuriseret.
Milch
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Engvang Sød Mælk 3.5 % or Milch?
Overall, Milch has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Milch has fewer calories: 47 kcal versus 63 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Engvang Sød Mælk 3.5 % has less sugar: 4.6 g versus 4.9 g per 100 g.