Weide-Milch 1,5% Fett vs 2.5% pasterizēts piens
Overall, Weide-Milch 1,5% Fett has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Weide-Milch 1,5% Fett | 2.5% pasterizēts piens |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 48 kcal | 53 kcal |
| Fat | 1.5 g | 2.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 1 g | 2 g |
| Sugars | 5 g | 4.7 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 3.5 g | 3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Weide-Milch 1,5% Fett has 40% less fat (1.5 g vs 2.5 g).
- Weide-Milch 1,5% Fett has 50% less saturated fat (1 g vs 2 g).
- Weide-Milch 1,5% Fett has 14% more protein (3.5 g vs 3 g).
Ingredients
Weide-Milch 1,5% Fett
fettarme Milch
2.5% pasterizēts piens
Pasterizēts _piens_
FAQ
Which is healthier: Weide-Milch 1,5% Fett or 2.5% pasterizēts piens?
Overall, Weide-Milch 1,5% Fett has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Weide-Milch 1,5% Fett has fewer calories: 48 kcal versus 53 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
2.5% pasterizēts piens has less sugar: 4.7 g versus 5 g per 100 g.