Energel: Quick Boost Forest Fruit vs Whey Isolate Zero
Overall, Whey Isolate Zero has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Energel: Quick Boost Forest Fruit
Whey Isolate Zero
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Energel: Quick Boost Forest... | Whey Isolate Zero |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | b |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 255 kcal | 368 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 45 g | 0.3 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 1.2 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 89 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Energel: Quick Boost Forest Fruit has 31% fewer calories (255 kcal vs 368 kcal).
- Energel: Quick Boost Forest Fruit has no fat, while Whey Isolate Zero has 0.3 g.
- Whey Isolate Zero has 99% less sugar (0.3 g vs 45 g).
- Energel: Quick Boost Forest Fruit has 97% less salt (0 g vs 1.2 g).
- Whey Isolate Zero has 100% more protein (89 g vs 0 g).
- Whey Isolate Zero has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Whey Isolate Zero lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Energel: Quick Boost Forest Fruit
Not available.
Whey Isolate Zero
Whey protein isolate (milk), cocoa powder (1.8%), emulsifier: soy lecithin, flavor, sweetener: sucralose.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Energel: Quick Boost Forest Fruit or Whey Isolate Zero?
Overall, Whey Isolate Zero has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Energel: Quick Boost Forest Fruit has fewer calories: 255 kcal versus 368 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Whey Isolate Zero has less sugar: 0.3 g versus 45 g per 100 g.