Elderflower Cordial vs Zero Maple flavored Syrup
Overall, Zero Maple flavored Syrup has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Elderflower Cordial | Zero Maple flavored Syrup |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | b |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 211 kcal | 21 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 52.8 g | 1.4 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 1 | 8 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Zero Maple flavored Syrup has 90% fewer calories (21 kcal vs 211 kcal).
- Zero Maple flavored Syrup has 97% less sugar (1.4 g vs 52.8 g).
- Zero Maple flavored Syrup has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Zero Maple flavored Syrup lists: Gluten, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Elderflower Cordial
Water, Sugar, Lemon Juice from Concentrate, Elderflowers, Acid: Citric Acid; Flavourings.
Zero Maple flavored Syrup
Eau , Épaississant (Adipate de Diamidon Acétylé), Caramel (Sirop de Glucose-Fructose, Sucre , Eau , Correcteur d'Acidité (Hydroxyde de Sodium)), Arôme Érable (0,6 %) (GLUTEN), Correcteur d'Acidité (Acide Citrique), Sel, Épaississant (Gomme Xanthane), Conservateurs (Sorbate de Potassium, Benzoate de Sodium), Édulcorant (Sucralose), Extrait de Levure, Colorant (Caramel au SULFITE d'Ammonium) .
FAQ
Which is healthier: Elderflower Cordial or Zero Maple flavored Syrup?
Overall, Zero Maple flavored Syrup has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Zero Maple flavored Syrup has fewer calories: 21 kcal versus 211 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Zero Maple flavored Syrup has less sugar: 1.4 g versus 52.8 g per 100 g.