El Carisma vs Merlot
Overall, El Carisma has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | El Carisma | Merlot |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 6 kcal | 75 kcal |
| Fat | 0.1 g | — |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | — |
| Sugars | 0.3 g | 0.6 g |
| Salt | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0.1 g | — |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- El Carisma has 92% fewer calories (6 kcal vs 75 kcal).
- El Carisma has 50% less sugar (0.3 g vs 0.6 g).
- Only Merlot lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
El Carisma
Trauben, Stabilisatoren, Gummi arabicum und Konservierungsstoffe (Schwefeldioxid) - enthält Sulfite
Merlot
Frankreich Merlot trocken Wein Zutaten: Trauben, konzentrierter Traubenmost, Antioxidationsmittel: Sulfite; Stabilisator: enthält Metaweinsäure und/oder Citronensäure. Die Abfüllung kann unter Schutzatmosphäre erfolgen. Durchschnittliche Nährwerte pro 100 ml Brennwert 314 kJ / 75 kcal Kohlenhydrate 1,4 g davon: - Zucker 0,6 g Enthält geringfügige Mengen von Fett, gesättigte Fettsäuren, Eiweiß und Salz. JANEE Pays d'Oc IGP Merlot Speiseempfehlung: Passend zu Fleischgerichten | Recommended with: meat an shes/Accords mets et vins: en accompagne de plats de viande et de pâtes Spijsadvies: bij vlees - en pastagerechte
FAQ
Which is healthier: El Carisma or Merlot?
Overall, El Carisma has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
El Carisma has fewer calories: 6 kcal versus 75 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
El Carisma has less sugar: 0.3 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.