Comparison
El Carisma vs Merlot
Overall, El Carisma has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | El Carisma | Merlot |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 6 kcal | 30 kcal |
| Fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | — |
| Sugars | 0.3 g | 0.1 g |
| Salt | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- El Carisma has 80% fewer calories (6 kcal vs 30 kcal).
Ingredients
El Carisma
Trauben, Stabilisatoren, Gummi arabicum und Konservierungsstoffe (Schwefeldioxid) - enthält Sulfite
Merlot
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: El Carisma or Merlot?
Overall, El Carisma has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
El Carisma has fewer calories: 6 kcal versus 30 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Merlot has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 0.3 g per 100 g.