Ekologiska Halkidiki Oliver vs Ekologiska halkidiki
Overall, Ekologiska halkidiki has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Ekologiska Halkidiki Oliver | Ekologiska halkidiki |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 144 kcal | 154 kcal |
| Fat | 14.3 g | 15 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.3 g | 2.2 g |
| Sugars | 0.1 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 3.5 g | 1.1 g |
| Fiber | 3.2 g | 1 g |
| Protein | 1.2 g | 1.6 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Ekologiska Halkidiki Oliver has 80% less sugar (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Ekologiska halkidiki has 69% less salt (1.1 g vs 3.5 g).
- Ekologiska Halkidiki Oliver has 70% more fiber (3.2 g vs 1 g).
- Ekologiska halkidiki has 25% more protein (1.6 g vs 1.2 g).
- Ekologiska halkidiki has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Ekologiska Halkidiki Oliver
Gröna oliver, vatten, salt, surhetsreglerande medel (mjölksyra).
Ekologiska halkidiki
Vatten, ekologiska urkärnade halkidikioliver*, salt. *Ekologiskt certifierad ingrediens.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Ekologiska Halkidiki Oliver or Ekologiska halkidiki?
Overall, Ekologiska halkidiki has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Ekologiska Halkidiki Oliver has fewer calories: 144 kcal versus 154 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Ekologiska Halkidiki Oliver has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.