Ekologiska halkidiki vs Olive Halkidiki verdi dolci giganti
Overall, Ekologiska halkidiki has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 2.
Ekologiska halkidiki
Olive Halkidiki verdi dolci giganti
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Ekologiska halkidiki | Olive Halkidiki verdi dolci... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 154 kcal | 176 kcal |
| Fat | 15 g | 18 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.2 g | 3 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.1 g | 4 g |
| Fiber | 1 g | 3 g |
| Protein | 1.6 g | 1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Ekologiska halkidiki has 13% fewer calories (154 kcal vs 176 kcal).
- Ekologiska halkidiki has 17% less fat (15 g vs 18 g).
- Ekologiska halkidiki has 27% less saturated fat (2.2 g vs 3 g).
- Olive Halkidiki verdi dolci giganti has no sugar, while Ekologiska halkidiki has 0.5 g.
- Ekologiska halkidiki has 73% less salt (1.1 g vs 4 g).
- Olive Halkidiki verdi dolci giganti has 68% more fiber (3 g vs 1 g).
- Ekologiska halkidiki has 38% more protein (1.6 g vs 1 g).
- Ekologiska halkidiki has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Ekologiska halkidiki
Vatten, ekologiska urkärnade halkidikioliver*, salt. *Ekologiskt certifierad ingrediens.
Olive Halkidiki verdi dolci giganti
Olive, acqua, sale; acidificante: acido lattico, antiossidante: acido ascorbico.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Ekologiska halkidiki or Olive Halkidiki verdi dolci giganti?
Overall, Ekologiska halkidiki has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Ekologiska halkidiki has fewer calories: 154 kcal versus 176 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Olive Halkidiki verdi dolci giganti has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.