Duo de raisins moelleux vs Raisins & Cranberries
Overall, Duo de raisins moelleux has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Duo de raisins moelleux
Raisins & Cranberries
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Duo de raisins moelleux | Raisins & Cranberries |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 264 kcal | 319 kcal |
| Fat | 0.6 g | 0.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 55 g | 69.3 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 3.5 g | 1.5 g |
| Protein | 2 g | 1.4 g |
| Additives | 2 | 1 |
| Allergens | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Duo de raisins moelleux has 17% fewer calories (264 kcal vs 319 kcal).
- Duo de raisins moelleux has 21% less sugar (55 g vs 69.3 g).
- Duo de raisins moelleux has 57% more fiber (3.5 g vs 1.5 g).
- Duo de raisins moelleux has 30% more protein (2 g vs 1.4 g).
- Only Duo de raisins moelleux lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Duo de raisins moelleux
Raisins secs 89 % (raisins Flame, raisins Golden, huile de tournesol, conservateur : anhydride sulfureux), eau, conservateur: E202.
Raisins & Cranberries
FLAME RAISINS (34%) (Raisins, Sunflower Oil), GOLDEN RAISINS (33%) (Raisins, Sunflower Oil, Preservative: NUTRITION This pack conta TYPICAL VALUES Per 100g Sulphur Dioxide), SWEETENED DRIED CRANBERRIES (33%) (Cranberries, Sugar, Sunflower Oil).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Duo de raisins moelleux or Raisins & Cranberries?
Overall, Duo de raisins moelleux has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Duo de raisins moelleux has fewer calories: 264 kcal versus 319 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Duo de raisins moelleux has less sugar: 55 g versus 69.3 g per 100 g.