Drinkyoghurt mango passievrucht vs Ayran Drinken
Overall, Drinkyoghurt mango passievrucht has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Drinkyoghurt mango passievru... | Ayran Drinken |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 31 kcal | 37 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 2.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 1.4 g |
| Sugars | 3.4 g | 2.7 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.6 g |
| Fiber | 0.7 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 3.1 g | 1.8 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Drinkyoghurt mango passievrucht has 17% fewer calories (31 kcal vs 37 kcal).
- Drinkyoghurt mango passievrucht has no fat, while Ayran Drinken has 2.1 g.
- Drinkyoghurt mango passievrucht has no saturated fat, while Ayran Drinken has 1.4 g.
- Ayran Drinken has 20% less sugar (2.7 g vs 3.4 g).
- Drinkyoghurt mango passievrucht has 67% less salt (0.2 g vs 0.6 g).
- Drinkyoghurt mango passievrucht has 100% more fiber (0.7 g vs 0 g).
- Drinkyoghurt mango passievrucht has 42% more protein (3.1 g vs 1.8 g).
- Drinkyoghurt mango passievrucht has the better Nutri-Score.
- Ayran Drinken is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Drinkyoghurt mango passievrucht
Magere yoghurt, water, 2% vruchtensap (1% mango, 1% passievrucht), maïszetmeel, aroma, zoetstof: sucralose.
Ayran Drinken
Lait de vache pasteurisé, eau, sel, culture de yaourt
FAQ
Which is healthier: Drinkyoghurt mango passievrucht or Ayran Drinken?
Overall, Drinkyoghurt mango passievrucht has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Drinkyoghurt mango passievrucht has fewer calories: 31 kcal versus 37 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Ayran Drinken has less sugar: 2.7 g versus 3.4 g per 100 g.