Comparison

Chocomel vs Ayran Drinken

Overall, Ayran Drinken has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 4.

Nutrition per 100 ml

NutrientChocomelAyran Drinken
Nutri-Score b c
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 87 kcal 37 kcal
Fat 2.7 g 2.1 g
Saturated fat 1.9 g 1.4 g
Sugars 3.3 g 2.7 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.6 g
Fiber — 0 g
Protein 3.3 g 1.8 g
Additives10
AllergensNone listedMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Ayran Drinken has 57% fewer calories (37 kcal vs 87 kcal).
  • Ayran Drinken has 21% less fat (2.1 g vs 2.7 g).
  • Ayran Drinken has 26% less saturated fat (1.4 g vs 1.9 g).
  • Ayran Drinken has 18% less sugar (2.7 g vs 3.3 g).
  • Chocomel has 80% less salt (0.1 g vs 0.6 g).
  • Chocomel has 45% more protein (3.3 g vs 1.8 g).
  • Chocomel has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Ayran Drinken is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Ayran Drinken lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Chocomel

Chocolademelk (UHT) Ingrediënten: redeeltelijk afger suiker, cacao %), stabilisator: carrageen. oomde melk, FrieslandCampina Consumentenservice: Antwoordnummer 390, 3800 VB Amersfoort 0800-0765 www.chocomel.nl

Ayran Drinken

Lait de vache pasteurisé, eau, sel, culture de yaourt

FAQ

Which is healthier: Chocomel or Ayran Drinken?

Overall, Ayran Drinken has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Ayran Drinken has fewer calories: 37 kcal versus 87 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Ayran Drinken has less sugar: 2.7 g versus 3.3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons