Comparison

Dragon Kombucha vs Kombucha Pêche

Overall, Kombucha Pêche has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientDragon KombuchaKombucha Pêche
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 15 kcal 17 kcal
Fat 0 g 0 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0 g
Sugars 1.7 g 1.2 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 0 g 0 g
Protein 0 g 0 g
Additives22
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Kombucha Pêche has 29% less sugar (1.2 g vs 1.7 g).

Ingredients

Dragon Kombucha

90.5% kombucha tea (water, sugar, 0.5% green tea, kombucha culture (symbiosis of bacterias and yeasts)), 4.5% cold-pressed lemon juice, 2.7% cold-pressed lime juice, 1.8% pitaya pulp, beetroot juice, sweetener (steviol glycosides from Stevia), carbon dioxide

Kombucha Pêche

94,5% de thé kombucha (eau. sucre*, 0,5% de thé vert, culture de kombucha [mélange de bactéries et levures]), 1,9% de purée de pêche, 1,9% de jus d'orange pressé à froid, infusion d'hibiscus, jus de citron pressé à froid, arôme naturel de pêche, édulcorant (glycosides de stéviol issus de Stevia), dioxyde de carbone.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Dragon Kombucha or Kombucha Pêche?

Overall, Kombucha Pêche has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Dragon Kombucha has fewer calories: 15 kcal versus 17 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Kombucha Pêche has less sugar: 1.2 g versus 1.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons