Lipton sans sucre vs Kombucha Pêche
Overall, Lipton sans sucre has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Lipton sans sucre | Kombucha Pêche |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 1 kcal | 17 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 1.2 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 6 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Lipton sans sucre has 94% fewer calories (1 kcal vs 17 kcal).
- Lipton sans sucre has no sugar, while Kombucha Pêche has 1.2 g.
Ingredients
Lipton sans sucre
Eau, acidifiants (acide citrique, acide malique), extrait de thé noir (0,12%), jus de pêche à base de concentré (0,1%), arômes, correcteur d'acidité (citrates de sodium), édulcorants (acesulfame-K, sucralose), antioxydant (acide ascorbique).
Kombucha Pêche
94,5% de thé kombucha (eau. sucre*, 0,5% de thé vert, culture de kombucha [mélange de bactéries et levures]), 1,9% de purée de pêche, 1,9% de jus d'orange pressé à froid, infusion d'hibiscus, jus de citron pressé à froid, arôme naturel de pêche, édulcorant (glycosides de stéviol issus de Stevia), dioxyde de carbone.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Lipton sans sucre or Kombucha Pêche?
Overall, Lipton sans sucre has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Lipton sans sucre has fewer calories: 1 kcal versus 17 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Lipton sans sucre has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.2 g per 100 g.