Dragon Kombucha vs Tea Verde
Overall, Dragon Kombucha has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Dragon Kombucha | Tea Verde |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 15 kcal | 20 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 1.7 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 2 | 5 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Dragon Kombucha has 25% fewer calories (15 kcal vs 20 kcal).
- Tea Verde has no sugar, while Dragon Kombucha has 1.7 g.
- Dragon Kombucha has no salt, while Tea Verde has 0.3 g.
Ingredients
Dragon Kombucha
90.5% kombucha tea (water, sugar, 0.5% green tea, kombucha culture (symbiosis of bacterias and yeasts)), 4.5% cold-pressed lemon juice, 2.7% cold-pressed lime juice, 1.8% pitaya pulp, beetroot juice, sweetener (steviol glycosides from Stevia), carbon dioxide
Tea Verde
Água, açúcar, acidificante: ácido cítrico, aromas, extrato de chá verde (0,05%), regulador de acidez: citratos de sódio, antioxidante: ácido ascórbico, edulcorante: sucralose, corantes E-150d, E-142
FAQ
Which is healthier: Dragon Kombucha or Tea Verde?
Overall, Dragon Kombucha has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Dragon Kombucha has fewer calories: 15 kcal versus 20 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tea Verde has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.7 g per 100 g.