Comparison

Dés de mimolette et gouda vs Lindahls Pro+

Overall, Lindahls Pro+ has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 9 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientDés de mimolette et goudaLindahls Pro+
Nutri-Score e c
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 336 kcal 237 kcal
Fat 26 g 13 g
Saturated fat 18 g 9.2 g
Sugars 0.5 g 0 g
Salt 1.8 g 0 g
Fiber — 0 g
Protein 25 g 30 g
Additives20
AllergensMilkMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Lindahls Pro+ has 29% fewer calories (237 kcal vs 336 kcal).
  • Lindahls Pro+ has 50% less fat (13 g vs 26 g).
  • Lindahls Pro+ has 49% less saturated fat (9.2 g vs 18 g).
  • Lindahls Pro+ has no sugar, while Dés de mimolette et gouda has 0.5 g.
  • Lindahls Pro+ has no salt, while Dés de mimolette et gouda has 1.8 g.
  • Lindahls Pro+ has 17% more protein (30 g vs 25 g).
  • Lindahls Pro+ has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Lindahls Pro+ is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Dés de mimolette et gouda

Mimolette : LAIT pasteurisé de vache (Origine : UE), sel, ferments LACTIQUES, enzymes coagulantes, colorants . rocou et caroténoïde. Gouda : LAIT pasteurisé de vache (Origine : UE), sel, ferments LACTIQUES, enzymes coagulantes. A conserver entre +20 C et +60 C. A conserver au réfrigérateur après ouverture et à consommer dans les 48h. Conditionné sous atmosphère protectrice.

Lindahls Pro+

_Lait_ de vache pasteurisé origine France, sel, ferments lactiques

FAQ

Which is healthier: Dés de mimolette et gouda or Lindahls Pro+?

Overall, Lindahls Pro+ has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Lindahls Pro+ has fewer calories: 237 kcal versus 336 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Lindahls Pro+ has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons