Delikatesní salám vs Pepperami
Overall, Delikatesní salám has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Delikatesní salám | Pepperami |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 377 kcal | 497 kcal |
| Fat | 32 g | 44 g |
| Saturated fat | 14.1 g | 18 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 2 g |
| Salt | 4 g | 3.9 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 21.5 g | 23 g |
| Additives | 3 | 4 |
| Allergens | Celery, Mustard, Pork | Pork |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Delikatesní salám has 24% fewer calories (377 kcal vs 497 kcal).
- Delikatesní salám has 27% less fat (32 g vs 44 g).
- Delikatesní salám has 22% less saturated fat (14.1 g vs 18 g).
- Delikatesní salám has 75% less sugar (0.5 g vs 2 g).
- Only Delikatesní salám lists: Celery, Mustard.
Ingredients
Delikatesní salám
pork, table salt, dextrose, spices (contains mustard flour , celery ), spice extracts, colouring food beetroot powder, antioxidant: sodium ascorbate, ascorbic acid, preservative: sodium nitrite, beech wood smoke
Pepperami
pork, iodised salt (salt, potassium iodate), dextrose, spices, pork fat, flavour enhancers (monosodium glutamate, disodium inosinate, disodium guanylate), preservative (sodium nitrite), beechwood smoke, transparent casing around the salami is not edible, 26,03,25 l4185 d063729 not for eu of ca pr sa *0/ ** c not for individual resale 4251097 419244 ,gt, not for individual resale
FAQ
Which is healthier: Delikatesní salám or Pepperami?
Overall, Delikatesní salám has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Delikatesní salám has fewer calories: 377 kcal versus 497 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Delikatesní salám has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 2 g per 100 g.