Delikatesní salám vs Salami-Sticks
Overall, Delikatesní salám has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Delikatesní salám | Salami-Sticks |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 377 kcal | 510 kcal |
| Fat | 32 g | 42 g |
| Saturated fat | 14.1 g | 16 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 3.2 g |
| Salt | 4 g | 5 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 21.5 g | 29 g |
| Additives | 3 | 4 |
| Allergens | Celery, Mustard, Pork | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Delikatesní salám has 26% fewer calories (377 kcal vs 510 kcal).
- Delikatesní salám has 24% less fat (32 g vs 42 g).
- Delikatesní salám has 12% less saturated fat (14.1 g vs 16 g).
- Delikatesní salám has 84% less sugar (0.5 g vs 3.2 g).
- Delikatesní salám has 20% less salt (4 g vs 5 g).
- Salami-Sticks has 26% more protein (29 g vs 21.5 g).
- Only Delikatesní salám lists: Celery, Mustard, Pork.
- Only Salami-Sticks lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Delikatesní salám
pork, table salt, dextrose, spices (contains mustard flour , celery ), spice extracts, colouring food beetroot powder, antioxidant: sodium ascorbate, ascorbic acid, preservative: sodium nitrite, beech wood smoke
Salami-Sticks
Varkensvlees, zout, lactose (melk), dextrose, specerijen, antioxidanten: ascorbinezuur, rozemarijnextracten, conserveermiddel: natriumnitriet, fermenten. Omhulsel: natriumalginaat, cellulose, collageen.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Delikatesní salám or Salami-Sticks?
Overall, Delikatesní salám has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Delikatesní salám has fewer calories: 377 kcal versus 510 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Delikatesní salám has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 3.2 g per 100 g.