Feinschmecker Salami vs Pepperami
Overall, Feinschmecker Salami has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Feinschmecker Salami | Pepperami |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 355 kcal | 497 kcal |
| Fat | 28.1 g | 44 g |
| Saturated fat | 11 g | 18 g |
| Sugars | 1 g | 2 g |
| Salt | 4.1 g | 3.9 g |
| Protein | 24.1 g | 23 g |
| Additives | 2 | 4 |
| Allergens | None listed | Pork |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Feinschmecker Salami has 29% fewer calories (355 kcal vs 497 kcal).
- Feinschmecker Salami has 36% less fat (28.1 g vs 44 g).
- Feinschmecker Salami has 39% less saturated fat (11 g vs 18 g).
- Feinschmecker Salami has 50% less sugar (1 g vs 2 g).
- Only Pepperami lists: Pork.
Ingredients
Feinschmecker Salami
Schweinefleisch, Rindfleisch, jodiertes Speisesalz (Speisesalz, Kaliumiodat), Traubenzucker, Gewürze, Gewürzextrakte, Antioxidationsmittel: Natriumascorbat; Konservierungsstoff: Natriumnitrit; Reifekulturen, Buchenholzrauch.
Pepperami
pork, iodised salt (salt, potassium iodate), dextrose, spices, pork fat, flavour enhancers (monosodium glutamate, disodium inosinate, disodium guanylate), preservative (sodium nitrite), beechwood smoke, transparent casing around the salami is not edible, 26,03,25 l4185 d063729 not for eu of ca pr sa *0/ ** c not for individual resale 4251097 419244 ,gt, not for individual resale
FAQ
Which is healthier: Feinschmecker Salami or Pepperami?
Overall, Feinschmecker Salami has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Feinschmecker Salami has fewer calories: 355 kcal versus 497 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Feinschmecker Salami has less sugar: 1 g versus 2 g per 100 g.