Comparison

Daube béarnaise le bocal de 720 g vs Daube de Boeuf marinée au vin rouge

Overall, Daube de Boeuf marinée au vin rouge has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientDaube béarnaise le bocal de...Daube de Boeuf marinée au vi...
Nutri-Score a b
NOVA group — 4
Calories 155 kcal 117 kcal
Fat 6.8 g 3.5 g
Saturated fat 2.6 g 1.5 g
Sugars 1.2 g 0.4 g
Salt 0.6 g 0.6 g
Fiber — 1.4 g
Protein 18 g 19 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedSulphur dioxide and sulphites

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Daube de Boeuf marinée au vin rouge has 25% fewer calories (117 kcal vs 155 kcal).
  • Daube de Boeuf marinée au vin rouge has 49% less fat (3.5 g vs 6.8 g).
  • Daube de Boeuf marinée au vin rouge has 42% less saturated fat (1.5 g vs 2.6 g).
  • Daube de Boeuf marinée au vin rouge has 67% less sugar (0.4 g vs 1.2 g).
  • Daube béarnaise le bocal de 720 g has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Daube de Boeuf marinée au vin rouge lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.

Ingredients

Daube béarnaise le bocal de 720 g

Not available.

Daube de Boeuf marinée au vin rouge

Viande de bœuf (Origine France) 55%, vin rouge (_sulfite_), carottes, oignons, champignons de Paris, concentré de jus de carottes de d'oignons, arômes naturels, liant xxx d'amidon modifié de maïs), sel, poivre

FAQ

Which is healthier: Daube béarnaise le bocal de 720 g or Daube de Boeuf marinée au vin rouge?

Overall, Daube de Boeuf marinée au vin rouge has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Daube de Boeuf marinée au vin rouge has fewer calories: 117 kcal versus 155 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Daube de Boeuf marinée au vin rouge has less sugar: 0.4 g versus 1.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons