Comparison

Dates Cinnamon Bun vs Drips Milk Chocolate Caramel Dates

Overall, Dates Cinnamon Bun has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientDates Cinnamon BunDrips Milk Chocolate Caramel...
Nutri-Score d e
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 354 kcal 406 kcal
Fat 6.9 g 13.6 g
Saturated fat 3.2 g 7.9 g
Sugars 49.9 g 54 g
Salt 0.2 g 0.1 g
Fiber 8 g 6.7 g
Protein 3.4 g 3.9 g
Additives00
AllergensGluten, Nuts, Almond flourNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Dates Cinnamon Bun has 13% fewer calories (354 kcal vs 406 kcal).
  • Dates Cinnamon Bun has 49% less fat (6.9 g vs 13.6 g).
  • Dates Cinnamon Bun has 59% less saturated fat (3.2 g vs 7.9 g).
  • Dates Cinnamon Bun has 16% more fiber (8 g vs 6.7 g).
  • Drips Milk Chocolate Caramel Dates has 13% more protein (3.9 g vs 3.4 g).
  • Dates Cinnamon Bun has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Dates Cinnamon Bun lists: Gluten, Nuts, Almond flour.

Ingredients

Dates Cinnamon Bun

Dates, _oats_, _almond flour_, vegetable oil (coconut, shea), cinnamon, flavor, salt.

Drips Milk Chocolate Caramel Dates

Dadler 65 %, melkesjokolade 33 % (sukker, kakaosmør, helmelkpulver, kakaomasse, emulgator (soyalecitin), naturlig vaniljearoma), vegetabilsk olje (kokos, shea), sikorirotfiber, naturlig aroma, salt. Kan inneholde peanøtter, nøtter og soya. *Kan inneholde enkelte steiner eller steinfragmenter.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Dates Cinnamon Bun or Drips Milk Chocolate Caramel Dates?

Overall, Dates Cinnamon Bun has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Dates Cinnamon Bun has fewer calories: 354 kcal versus 406 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Dates Cinnamon Bun has less sugar: 49.9 g versus 54 g per 100 g.

More comparisons