Comparison

Cuisses de poulet rôties vs Pollo Kebab

Overall, Cuisses de poulet rôties has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCuisses de poulet rôtiesPollo Kebab
Nutri-Score c d
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 160 kcal 193 kcal
Fat 8.8 g 13 g
Saturated fat 2.5 g 4.1 g
Sugars 0.6 g 0.5 g
Salt 1.3 g 1.3 g
Fiber 0 g 1.3 g
Protein 20 g 18 g
Additives10
AllergensGlutenCelery, Eggs, Gluten, Milk, Mustard

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Cuisses de poulet rôties has 17% fewer calories (160 kcal vs 193 kcal).
  • Cuisses de poulet rôties has 32% less fat (8.8 g vs 13 g).
  • Cuisses de poulet rôties has 39% less saturated fat (2.5 g vs 4.1 g).
  • Pollo Kebab has 100% more fiber (1.3 g vs 0 g).
  • Cuisses de poulet rôties has 10% more protein (20 g vs 18 g).
  • Cuisses de poulet rôties has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Pollo Kebab lists: Celery, Eggs, Milk, Mustard.

Ingredients

Cuisses de poulet rôties

Cuisses de poulet (origine : France), eau, sel, sucre roux, sirop de glucose de blé, protéines de pois, fibre de carotte, épaississant : carraghénanes.

Pollo Kebab

Mięso z nogi kurczaka, przyprawy, sól, ekstrakt drożdżowy, skrobia kukurydziana, aromaty (w tym naturalny aromat), cukier, glukoza, ekstrakty przypraw. Produkt może zawierać: zboża zawierające gluten (pszenica), soję, jaja, mleko (łącznie z laktoza), seler, gorczycę

FAQ

Which is healthier: Cuisses de poulet rôties or Pollo Kebab?

Overall, Cuisses de poulet rôties has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Cuisses de poulet rôties has fewer calories: 160 kcal versus 193 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Pollo Kebab has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons