Cuisses de poulet fermier vs Spécial Kebab's
Overall, Cuisses de poulet fermier has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Cuisses de poulet fermier
Spécial Kebab's
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Cuisses de poulet fermier | Spécial Kebab's |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 181 kcal | 225 kcal |
| Fat | 12 g | 10 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.5 g | 2.6 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 1 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 19 g | 17.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 3 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cuisses de poulet fermier has 20% fewer calories (181 kcal vs 225 kcal).
- Spécial Kebab's has 17% less fat (10 g vs 12 g).
- Spécial Kebab's has 26% less saturated fat (2.6 g vs 3.5 g).
- Cuisses de poulet fermier has no sugar, while Spécial Kebab's has 0.5 g.
- Cuisses de poulet fermier has 55% less salt (0.5 g vs 1 g).
- Cuisses de poulet fermier has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Spécial Kebab's lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Cuisses de poulet fermier
100% cuisse de poulet jaune.
Spécial Kebab's
Viande de cuisses de poulet, eau, plantes aromatiques 1,15%, épice 0,95%, sel, fécule de pomme de terre, stabilisants : E451, dextrose, chapelure (farine de _blé_, sel, agent levant : E503), maltodextrine de pomme de terre, tomate déshydratée, sucre, colorants : extrait de paprika ou E160c, arômes naturels.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cuisses de poulet fermier or Spécial Kebab's?
Overall, Cuisses de poulet fermier has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cuisses de poulet fermier has fewer calories: 181 kcal versus 225 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cuisses de poulet fermier has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.