Crispy Sweet Potato Fries vs La patate douce
Overall, La patate douce has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Crispy Sweet Potato Fries | La patate douce |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | b |
| NOVA group | 4 | 1 |
| Calories | 154 kcal | 60 kcal |
| Fat | 7.6 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.8 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 7.1 g | 6 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 3.6 g | 1.3 g |
| Protein | 2.3 g | 0.1 g |
| Additives | 5 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- La patate douce has 61% fewer calories (60 kcal vs 154 kcal).
- La patate douce has 93% less fat (0.5 g vs 7.6 g).
- La patate douce has 88% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.8 g).
- La patate douce has 15% less sugar (6 g vs 7.1 g).
- La patate douce has 83% less salt (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Crispy Sweet Potato Fries has 64% more fiber (3.6 g vs 1.3 g).
- Crispy Sweet Potato Fries has 97% more protein (2.3 g vs 0.1 g).
- La patate douce has the better Nutri-Score.
- La patate douce is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Crispy Sweet Potato Fries
88% sweet potatoes, 8% sunflower oil, 4% seasoned coating (modified starch, rice flour, dextrin, salt, spices [paprika, black pepper], garlic powder, onion powder, raising agents: diphosphates, sodium carbonates, thickener: xanthan gum, natural paprika flavouring),
La patate douce
Patates douces, surgelées
FAQ
Which is healthier: Crispy Sweet Potato Fries or La patate douce?
Overall, La patate douce has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
La patate douce has fewer calories: 60 kcal versus 154 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
La patate douce has less sugar: 6 g versus 7.1 g per 100 g.