Comparison

Crépinette de Porc vs Sächsischer Leberkäse k classic

Overall, Crépinette de Porc has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCrépinette de PorcSächsischer Leberkäse k clas...
Nutri-Score d e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 256 kcal 242 kcal
Fat 22 g 20 g
Saturated fat 8.3 g 8.6 g
Sugars 0.5 g 1.5 g
Salt 1.6 g 1.9 g
Fiber 0 g 0 g
Protein 14 g 13.5 g
Additives36
AllergensNone listedCelery, Mustard

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Crépinette de Porc has 67% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1.5 g).
  • Crépinette de Porc has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Sächsischer Leberkäse k classic lists: Celery, Mustard.

Ingredients

Crépinette de Porc

82,8% viande de porc (Origine : France), crépine de porc, conservateur: lactate de potassium ;sel, persil, dextrose, correcteur d'acidité :acétates de sodium; épices, antioxydant :érythorbate de sodium ;plante aromatique, arômes naturels.

Sächsischer Leberkäse k classic

Schweinefleisch (55 %), Schweineleber (25 %), Speck, Trinkwasser, jodiertes Nitritpökelsalz [jodiertes Speisesalz (Speisesalz, Kaliumjodat), Konservierungsstoff: Natriumnitrit], Gewürze (enthält Senf, Sellerie), Glukosesirup, Zucker, Dextrose, Stabilisatoren (Natriumcitrate, Diphosphate), Antioxidationsmittel (Ascorbinsäure, Natriumascor - bat), Gewürzextrakte, Säuerungsmittel (Natriumdiacetat). Kann Spuren von Pistazien enthalten.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Crépinette de Porc or Sächsischer Leberkäse k classic?

Overall, Crépinette de Porc has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Sächsischer Leberkäse k classic has fewer calories: 242 kcal versus 256 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Crépinette de Porc has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons