Crème fraîche épaisse Entière 30% Mat.Gr. vs Nata fresca para cocinar
Overall, Nata fresca para cocinar has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Crème fraîche épaisse Entière 30% Mat.Gr.
Nata fresca para cocinar
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Crème fraîche épaisse Entièr... | Nata fresca para cocinar |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 291 kcal | 284 kcal |
| Fat | 30 g | 29.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 22 g | 19.3 g |
| Sugars | 2.9 g | 1.9 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 2.3 g | 2.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Nata fresca para cocinar has 12% less saturated fat (19.3 g vs 22 g).
- Nata fresca para cocinar has 34% less sugar (1.9 g vs 2.9 g).
Ingredients
Crème fraîche épaisse Entière 30% Mat.Gr.
_Crème_ biologique (origine France), ferments _lactiques_.
Nata fresca para cocinar
Nata fresca pasteurizada, fermentos lácteos.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Crème fraîche épaisse Entière 30% Mat.Gr. or Nata fresca para cocinar?
Overall, Nata fresca para cocinar has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Nata fresca para cocinar has fewer calories: 284 kcal versus 291 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Nata fresca para cocinar has less sugar: 1.9 g versus 2.9 g per 100 g.