Comparison

Crème de tomates séchées au basilic vs Artischoken pesto mit Cashewnüssen

Overall, Crème de tomates séchées au basilic has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCrème de tomates séchées au...Artischoken pesto mit Cashew...
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group 3 3
Calories 264 kcal 237 kcal
Fat 22.8 g 22 g
Saturated fat 2.8 g 3.1 g
Sugars 9.3 g 1.7 g
Salt 1.5 g 1.8 g
Fiber 6.3 g 5.5 g
Protein 3.7 g 2 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNuts

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Artischoken pesto mit Cashewnüssen has 10% fewer calories (237 kcal vs 264 kcal).
  • Artischoken pesto mit Cashewnüssen has 82% less sugar (1.7 g vs 9.3 g).
  • Crème de tomates séchées au basilic has 17% less salt (1.5 g vs 1.8 g).
  • Crème de tomates séchées au basilic has 13% more fiber (6.3 g vs 5.5 g).
  • Crème de tomates séchées au basilic has 46% more protein (3.7 g vs 2 g).
  • Only Artischoken pesto mit Cashewnüssen lists: Nuts.

Ingredients

Crème de tomates séchées au basilic

Tomates séchées réhydratées 48%, tomates concentré, huile de tournesol, huile olives, câpres, ail, basilic 2.2%, jus de citron concentré

Artischoken pesto mit Cashewnüssen

Artischocken** 71%, Olivenol nativ extra 20%, Cashewnusse 4,5%, Basilikum, Salz, Zitronensaft**. *aus ökologischem Anbau.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Crème de tomates séchées au basilic or Artischoken pesto mit Cashewnüssen?

Overall, Crème de tomates séchées au basilic has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Artischoken pesto mit Cashewnüssen has fewer calories: 237 kcal versus 264 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Artischoken pesto mit Cashewnüssen has less sugar: 1.7 g versus 9.3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons