Crema con Aceto Balsamico vs Mercadona
Overall, Mercadona has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Crema con Aceto Balsamico | Mercadona |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 251 kcal | 178 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 53 g | 40 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.6 g |
| Protein | 1 g | 1.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites, Sulfitos |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Mercadona has 29% fewer calories (178 kcal vs 251 kcal).
- Mercadona has no fat, while Crema con Aceto Balsamico has 0.5 g.
- Mercadona has 25% less sugar (40 g vs 53 g).
- Crema con Aceto Balsamico has 87% less salt (0.1 g vs 0.6 g).
- Only Mercadona lists: Sulfitos.
Ingredients
Crema con Aceto Balsamico
Traubenmost*¹ konzentriert, Aceto Balsamico di Modena g.g.A.* 23 % (Weinessig*¹, Traubenmost*¹ konzentriert), Verdickungsmittel: Maisstärke* *aus biologischer Landwirtschaft ¹ENTHÄLT SULFITE.
Mercadona
Mosto concentrado de uva, vinagre balsámico de Módena (_sulfitos_), colorante (caramelo E150d), espesante (almidón modificado).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Crema con Aceto Balsamico or Mercadona?
Overall, Mercadona has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Mercadona has fewer calories: 178 kcal versus 251 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Mercadona has less sugar: 40 g versus 53 g per 100 g.