Crema Balsamico Classic vs Crema con Aceto Balsamico
Overall, Crema Balsamico Classic has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Crema Balsamico Classic
Crema con Aceto Balsamico
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Crema Balsamico Classic | Crema con Aceto Balsamico |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 228 kcal | 251 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 34 g | 53 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0.2 g | — |
| Protein | 0.4 g | 1 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Crema Balsamico Classic has no fat, while Crema con Aceto Balsamico has 0.5 g.
- Crema Balsamico Classic has 36% less sugar (34 g vs 53 g).
- Crema con Aceto Balsamico has 60% more protein (1 g vs 0.4 g).
Ingredients
Crema Balsamico Classic
60% Aceto Balsamico di Modena IGP Weinessig (enthält Sulfite), konzentrierter Traubenmost (enthält Sulfite)], Glukosesirup, gekochter Traubenmost (enthält Sulfite), modifizierte Stärke.
Crema con Aceto Balsamico
Traubenmost*¹ konzentriert, Aceto Balsamico di Modena g.g.A.* 23 % (Weinessig*¹, Traubenmost*¹ konzentriert), Verdickungsmittel: Maisstärke* *aus biologischer Landwirtschaft ¹ENTHÄLT SULFITE.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Crema Balsamico Classic or Crema con Aceto Balsamico?
Overall, Crema Balsamico Classic has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Crema Balsamico Classic has fewer calories: 228 kcal versus 251 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Crema Balsamico Classic has less sugar: 34 g versus 53 g per 100 g.