Comparison
Côtes de Blettes coupées vs Blettes
Overall, Côtes de Blettes coupées has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Côtes de Blettes coupées | Blettes |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 3 |
| Calories | 22 kcal | 11 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0.7 g | 1.3 g |
| Salt | 0.4 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | 2.4 g | 1.3 g |
| Protein | 2.2 g | 0.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Blettes has 50% fewer calories (11 kcal vs 22 kcal).
- Côtes de Blettes coupées has 46% less sugar (0.7 g vs 1.3 g).
- Côtes de Blettes coupées has 58% less salt (0.4 g vs 0.8 g).
- Côtes de Blettes coupées has 46% more fiber (2.4 g vs 1.3 g).
- Côtes de Blettes coupées has 65% more protein (2.2 g vs 0.8 g).
- Côtes de Blettes coupées is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Côtes de Blettes coupées
Côtes de blettes
Blettes
Blettes, eau, sel, acidifiant : acide citrique, antioxydant : acide ascorbique.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Côtes de Blettes coupées or Blettes?
Overall, Côtes de Blettes coupées has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Blettes has fewer calories: 11 kcal versus 22 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Côtes de Blettes coupées has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 1.3 g per 100 g.