Côte de Bœuf Race Charolaise vs Chistorra
Overall, Côte de Bœuf Race Charolaise has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.
Côte de Bœuf Race Charolaise
Chistorra
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Côte de Bœuf Race Charolaise | Chistorra |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | e |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 196 kcal | 400 kcal |
| Fat | 12 g | 35 g |
| Saturated fat | 5.3 g | 14 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 22 g | 14 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Côte de Bœuf Race Charolaise has 51% fewer calories (196 kcal vs 400 kcal).
- Côte de Bœuf Race Charolaise has 66% less fat (12 g vs 35 g).
- Côte de Bœuf Race Charolaise has 62% less saturated fat (5.3 g vs 14 g).
- Côte de Bœuf Race Charolaise has 90% less salt (0.2 g vs 2 g).
- Côte de Bœuf Race Charolaise has 36% more protein (22 g vs 14 g).
- Côte de Bœuf Race Charolaise has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Côte de Bœuf Race Charolaise
100 % viande de bœuf.
Chistorra
Carne y grasa de cerdo, sal, pimentón y ajo.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Côte de Bœuf Race Charolaise or Chistorra?
Overall, Côte de Bœuf Race Charolaise has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Côte de Bœuf Race Charolaise has fewer calories: 196 kcal versus 400 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Côte de Bœuf Race Charolaise has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.