Comparison

Côte de Bœuf Race Charolaise vs Chistorra

Overall, Côte de Bœuf Race Charolaise has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCôte de Bœuf Race CharolaiseChistorra
Nutri-Score c e
NOVA group 1 —
Calories 196 kcal 400 kcal
Fat 12 g 35 g
Saturated fat 5.3 g 14 g
Sugars 0 g 0 g
Salt 0.2 g 2 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 22 g 14 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Côte de Bœuf Race Charolaise has 51% fewer calories (196 kcal vs 400 kcal).
  • Côte de Bœuf Race Charolaise has 66% less fat (12 g vs 35 g).
  • Côte de Bœuf Race Charolaise has 62% less saturated fat (5.3 g vs 14 g).
  • Côte de Bœuf Race Charolaise has 90% less salt (0.2 g vs 2 g).
  • Côte de Bœuf Race Charolaise has 36% more protein (22 g vs 14 g).
  • Côte de Bœuf Race Charolaise has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Côte de Bœuf Race Charolaise

100 % viande de bœuf.

Chistorra

Carne y grasa de cerdo, sal, pimentón y ajo.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Côte de Bœuf Race Charolaise or Chistorra?

Overall, Côte de Bœuf Race Charolaise has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Côte de Bœuf Race Charolaise has fewer calories: 196 kcal versus 400 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Côte de Bœuf Race Charolaise has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.

More comparisons