Comparison

Côte de Bœuf Race Charolaise vs Burger meat de cerdo

Overall, Côte de Bœuf Race Charolaise has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCôte de Bœuf Race CharolaiseBurger meat de cerdo
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group 1 4
Calories 196 kcal 206 kcal
Fat 12 g 16 g
Saturated fat 5.3 g 6 g
Sugars 0 g 0.5 g
Salt 0.2 g 0.6 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 22 g 17 g
Additives02
AllergensNone listedSulphur dioxide and sulphites

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Côte de Bœuf Race Charolaise has 25% less fat (12 g vs 16 g).
  • Côte de Bœuf Race Charolaise has 12% less saturated fat (5.3 g vs 6 g).
  • Côte de Bœuf Race Charolaise has no sugar, while Burger meat de cerdo has 0.5 g.
  • Côte de Bœuf Race Charolaise has 65% less salt (0.2 g vs 0.6 g).
  • Côte de Bœuf Race Charolaise has 23% more protein (22 g vs 17 g).
  • Côte de Bœuf Race Charolaise is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Burger meat de cerdo lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.

Ingredients

Côte de Bœuf Race Charolaise

100 % viande de bœuf.

Burger meat de cerdo

Carne de cerdo 90%, agua, fibra vegetal (guisante), cereal (maíz), antioxidantes (E-331, E-301), aroma, conservador E-221 (sulfito).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Côte de Bœuf Race Charolaise or Burger meat de cerdo?

Overall, Côte de Bœuf Race Charolaise has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Côte de Bœuf Race Charolaise has fewer calories: 196 kcal versus 206 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Côte de Bœuf Race Charolaise has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons