Coppa 8 tranches vs Coppa
Overall, Coppa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Coppa 8 tranches | Coppa |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 277 kcal | 262 kcal |
| Fat | 19.1 g | 15 g |
| Saturated fat | 7.9 g | 6 g |
| Sugars | 0.9 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 5.6 g | 4.4 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 25.2 g | 30 g |
| Additives | 7 | 4 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk, None |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Coppa has 21% less fat (15 g vs 19.1 g).
- Coppa has 24% less saturated fat (6 g vs 7.9 g).
- Coppa has 44% less sugar (0.5 g vs 0.9 g).
- Coppa has 21% less salt (4.4 g vs 5.6 g).
- Coppa has 16% more protein (30 g vs 25.2 g).
- Only Coppa lists: Milk, None.
Ingredients
Coppa 8 tranches
Échine de porc - sel - dextrose - sirop de glucose - arômes - épices - sucre - antioxydants : acide ascorbique, ascorbate de sodium, érythorbate de sodium - conservateurs : lactate de sodium, acétates de sodium, nitrate de potassium, nitrite de sodium - ferments.
Coppa
Echine de porc origine U.E., sel, dextrose, sirop de glucose, arômes, épices, sucre, conservateurs : lactate de sodium, acétates de sodium, acide ascorbique, ascorbate de sodium, érythorbate de sodium, nitrite de sodium, nitrate de potassium, ferments. Présence possible de fruits à coques et de lait.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Coppa 8 tranches or Coppa?
Overall, Coppa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Coppa has fewer calories: 262 kcal versus 277 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Coppa has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.9 g per 100 g.