Comparison

Confiture de myrtille 70% vs Überraschung

Overall, Confiture de myrtille 70% has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientConfiture de myrtille 70%Überraschung
Nutri-Score c d
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 173 kcal 228 kcal
Fat 0.5 g 0.2 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 0.1 g
Sugars 37 g 53.3 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 3.7 g 1.4 g
Protein 0.5 g 0.4 g
Additives10
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Confiture de myrtille 70% has 24% fewer calories (173 kcal vs 228 kcal).
  • Überraschung has 60% less fat (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Confiture de myrtille 70% has 31% less sugar (37 g vs 53.3 g).
  • Confiture de myrtille 70% has 62% more fiber (3.7 g vs 1.4 g).
  • Confiture de myrtille 70% has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Confiture de myrtille 70%

blueberries 70%, sugar, concentrated lemon juice, gelling agent: fruit pectin,

Überraschung

029 990 FR Confiture extra de myrtilles. Préparée avec 50 g de fruits pour 100 g de produit fini. Teneur totale en sucres: 56g pour 100 g. Ingrédients: myrtilles, sucre, jus de citron concentré, gélifiant: pectines. Non ouvert, à consommer de préférence avant le : voir le bord du Couvercle. A conserver à l'abri de la chaleur, de l'humidité et des rayons du soleil Après ouverture, à conserver au réfrigérateur à +8°C maximum et à consommer rapidement. WICZ

FAQ

Which is healthier: Confiture de myrtille 70% or Überraschung?

Overall, Confiture de myrtille 70% has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Confiture de myrtille 70% has fewer calories: 173 kcal versus 228 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Confiture de myrtille 70% has less sugar: 37 g versus 53.3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons