Comparison

Concassé de tomates vs Rajčata

Overall, Rajčata has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientConcassé de tomatesRajčata
Nutri-Score — a
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 135 kcal 26 kcal
Fat 9.3 g 0.1 g
Saturated fat 1.1 g 0 g
Sugars 6.7 g 3.1 g
Salt 0.5 g 0 g
Fiber 4.2 g 1.3 g
Protein 2.2 g 1.3 g
Additives41
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Rajčata has 81% fewer calories (26 kcal vs 135 kcal).
  • Rajčata has 99% less fat (0.1 g vs 9.3 g).
  • Rajčata has no saturated fat, while Concassé de tomates has 1.1 g.
  • Rajčata has 54% less sugar (3.1 g vs 6.7 g).
  • Rajčata has 96% less salt (0 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Concassé de tomates has 69% more fiber (4.2 g vs 1.3 g).
  • Concassé de tomates has 41% more protein (2.2 g vs 1.3 g).

Ingredients

Concassé de tomates

Tomates mi-séchés 68,7 % (tomates 57 %, huile de tournesol, sel), double concentré de tomates 13,7 %, oignons pré-frits 10,3 % (oignons, huile de tournesol), huile d'olive vierge extra, basilic 1,3 %, préparation à base de tomates 1,1 % (jus concentré de tomate, sucre, huile de tournesol), plantes aromatiques, sucre, colorant : extrait de paprika, sel, amidon modifié de pomme de terre, acidifiant : acide citrique, conservateur : sorbate de potassium.

Rajčata

Tomato pulp; tomato juice; acidity regulator; citric acid

FAQ

Which is healthier: Concassé de tomates or Rajčata?

Overall, Rajčata has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Rajčata has fewer calories: 26 kcal versus 135 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Rajčata has less sugar: 3.1 g versus 6.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons