Comparison
Compotee d'abricots vs Abricot
Overall, Abricot has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Compotee d'abricots | Abricot |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | b |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 108 kcal | 107 kcal |
| Fat | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 25 g | 21 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.4 g | 1.3 g |
| Protein | 0.8 g | 0.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Abricot has 16% less sugar (21 g vs 25 g).
- Abricot has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Compotee d'abricots
Abricots (85 %), sucre.
Abricot
Pulpe d'abricot 85,4%, sucre, antioxydant : acide ascorbique.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Compotee d'abricots or Abricot?
Overall, Abricot has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Abricot has fewer calories: 107 kcal versus 108 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Abricot has less sugar: 21 g versus 25 g per 100 g.